Friday, September 10, 2010

Home-Based Intervention Seems to Provide Some Benefit to Dementia Patients, Caregivers

Home-Based Intervention Seems to Provide Some Benefit to Dementia Patients, Caregivers
But, did not find statistically significant differences for any outcome measure between COPE group and control group at 9 months
Aug. 31, 2010 – A program designed to improve the quality of life for home-bound dementia patients and their caregivers found some success, although caregivers perceived the greater benefits, according to a study in the September 1 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Among the more than 5 million persons in the United States with dementia, most live at home, and are cared for by family members. With disease progression, families increasingly provide hands-on physical assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), with this often resulting in heightened caregiver distress.

"Trials of anti-dementia medications show few if any benefits for physical function or caregiver burden and have substantial adverse effects," the authors write. "Optimal treatment to postpone functional decline in patients with dementia is not established."
The Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments (COPE) trial was designed by Laura N. Gitlin, Ph.D., of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and colleagues to test a non-pharmacologic, bio-behavioral approach to support physical function and quality of life for patients with dementia and the well-being of their caregivers.

"The COPE program targeted modifiable environmental stressors to decrease sensorial, physical, and cognitive demands and align with patient capabilities and also ruled out underlying medical conditions that could lead to reduced patient functioning. The intervention sought to re-engage patients in daily activities and increase functionality, thereby alleviating caregiver burden," the researchers write.

The trial included patients with dementia and family caregivers (community-living dyads [two individuals regarded as a pair, such as a husband and wife]) who were recruited from March 2006 through June 2008. Of 284 couples screened, 270 (95 percent) were eligible and 237 (88 percent) randomized.

Data were collected from 209 couples (88 percent) at 4 months and 173 (73 percent) at 9 months.

The intervention consisted of up to 12 home or telephone contacts over 4 months by health professionals who assessed patient capabilities and deficits; obtained blood and urine samples; and trained families in home safety, simplifying tasks and stress reduction. Control group caregivers received 3 telephone calls and educational materials.

The researchers found that there were statistically significant improvements in functional dependence for COPE patients at 4 months compared with control group patients. Improvement occurred mostly for instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and COPE patients improved slightly more in ADL functioning than controls, but this was not statistically significant. There were also small but statistically significant improvements in engagement for COPE compared with control patients.

COPE caregivers, compared with control group caregivers, reported improvement in well-being and enhanced confidence using activities. Of 112 caregivers (53.8 percent) reporting 1 or more caregiver-identified problems eliminated by 4 months, 64 (62.7 percent) were COPE caregivers and 48 (44.9 percent) were control group caregivers.

The researchers did not find statistically significant differences between the COPE group and the control group participants at 9 months for any outcome measure.

"However, COPE compared with control caregivers reported a 'great deal' of improvement in their lives overall, disease understanding, confidence managing behaviors, made life easier, ability to care for patients, patients' quality of life, and ability to keep patients home."

"Because most patients live at home with functional decline, a nonpharmacologic, biopsychosocial-environmental intervention may positively contribute to disease management. Future research needs to examine effects of underlying medical conditions, ways to boost treatment effects, cost-effectiveness, COPE in combination with pharmacologic treatments, and translational potential," the authors conclude.

http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Eldercare/2010/20100831-Home-BasedIntervention.htm

2 comments:

  1. These results are very interesting because studies in seniors without dementia have produced the same trends. The difference between in-home care versus nursing homes is very drastic, and suggests that staying in the home is better for seniors in all conditions. I think the familiar environment or a sense of independence contributes to the greater in happiness and overall health measured in these people. We would be wise to put this information into good use, and promote more in-home care and assisted living. Thank for you sharing!

    www.firststreetonline.com

    ReplyDelete